Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 

Areas with Higher Rates of Gun Ownership Have Higher Rates of Suicide

By LUCAS HIGH, Capital News Service

 

People who live in areas with higher rates of gun ownership are more likely to commit suicide, whether by gun or by some other means, say researchers who study the effects of firearms on society.

The correlation between gun ownership and suicide rates takes on added significance given the increase in firearms sales in the wake of tragedies like the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Connecticut. This week, a University of Maryland graduate student who suffered from mental illness, shot two of his roommates with a legally purchased 9 mm handgun, killing one before turning the gun on himself.

“Firearms suicides tend to be very compulsive acts,” said Professor Daniel Webster, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research. The compulsive nature of the act could be one of the factors in explaining why areas with more firearms have higher suicide rates.

Webster recently testified in support of one of Gov. Martin O’Malley’s proposed gun control bills.

There appears to be consensus amongst most researchers that there is a direct correlation between gun ownership and suicide rates.

But, “correlations do not necessarily indicate causality,” said Matthew Daley, vice president of Government Affairs for the Maryland State Rifle and Pistol Association.

Guns are the No. 1 way people kill themselves in the U.S. The lethality of firearms, which are far more effective than alternative suicide methods like hanging or overdose, combined with the sudden, overwhelming impulse to do self-harm creates a deadly mix, experts say.

“(A gun) is immediate. It’s easy, it’s right there,” said Linda Hofmann, director of Behavioral Health Services at Frederick Memorial Healthcare System. “It doesn’t require planning if they have a firearm in the house.”

Hofmann said that when someone is suicidal and has a known history of gun ownership, the behavioral health service works with the family to keep them far away from guns.

President Barack Obama and O’Malley are among a number of politicians around the country who have proposed new gun control legislation to reduce access to firearms.

“Certain individuals may find suicide with a gun more appealing than alternative methods – perhaps because of speed, the high probability of success, or because it is a culturally accepted method – and thus only attempt suicide when a gun is available,” said a 2002 study conducted by Mark Duggan, a professor of health care management and public policy at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

And it isn’t just households with guns that are more at risk for suicide, all of their neighbors have a higher likelihood of taking their own lives as well, studies say.

Duggan’s study suggests that people without easy access to guns don’t simply find another method to commit suicide, or may not be as successful. Without guns around, suicide rates go down.

Restricting access to firearms, especially by the mentally ill, can “significantly reduce suicides,” said Webster, of Johns Hopkins.

In 2006, the Israeli Defense Forces, in response to an increase in suicides, restricted troops from bringing home service weapons on the weekends. By 2010, suicides by Israeli soldiers had decreased by 40 percent, according to a study by IDF psychiatrists.

“Everybody should agree that if somebody makes a serious threat about committing harm to themselves or other people, that should be immediately reportable to law enforcement,” said Sen. Jamie B. Raskin, D-Montgomery, a co-sponsor of Maryland’s proposed gun control measures. “And at that point, law enforcement should be able to check out whether someone who is making these threats has access to firearms.”

When Washington passed a law banning the possession of handguns in the city, Duggan’s study concluded “that gun suicides occurring in the D.C. metro area declined by 23 percent.”

A 2001 survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that in the 15 states with the highest levels of gun ownership there were nearly 15,000 total suicides, compared with more than 8,000 total suicides in the 15 states with the lowest gun ownership, despite the latter having a larger population.

Wyoming and Alaska ranked highest in gun ownership, according to a survey conducted by the CDC, with more than half of households owning a firearm. Hawaii and New Jersey reported the lowest rate of gun ownership, with fewer than 13 percent of respondents claiming to own a gun.

In Maryland, 21.3 percent of people surveyed said they owned a firearm.

A 2004 report by the National Academy of Sciences identifies “at least two mechanisms by which guns might directly cause an increase in the risk of completed suicide.”

Because firearms “provide a uniquely efficient method of self-destruction,” access to guns results in a higher suicide success rate and a higher success rate means more suicides.

“The lethality of a gun might itself increase the likelihood of a suicide attempt among gun owners: persons who would prefer the efficiency of a gun would be less likely to make an attempt if a gun were not available,” the National Academy of Sciences report says.

A state National Rifle Association official forwarded Capital News Service to the national office for comment on this story. Capital News Service had not received a comment at the time of publication.

Related Topics: Guns and Suicide

Comment_arrow

Steve

9:07 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

John Lott was discredited years ago.

Comment_arrow

Native

11:27 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Steve, I hadn't heard that. What are your sources?

Svi

8:28 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Areas with higher black populations have higher rates of murder, robbery, rape, and violent crime.

Correlation data can be fun.

Reply

MrApple

10:05 am on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Suicide is one of those touchy subjects that makes people uncomfortable to discuss. We live in a FREE nation where we have the right to live our lives as we see fit. This also includes the right to end our lives if we choose to. I'm not a suicide advocate but I honor every American to make their own decisions, good or bad, and then live with the consequences. I personal think that suicide is a horrible mistake that you can't come back from but who am I to say that you can not go that route if you really want. And as for the use of a firearm in the act of suicide, why not. If someone wants to die should they be restricted to swinging on a rope for 15 minutes suffering or a slow death from poisoning? A firearm is fast and generally effective; a great choice if you want to get act over with quickly. Once again, I truly feel that suicide is a ultimate last resort option but free people should have the right to choose.

Reply

Buck Harmon

12:59 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

So what exactly is the reason for this post...is there a valid point..?...can it possibly be accurate when most guns aren't registered and no one really knows how many or where they are?

Reply

Michael

5:37 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

Almost all of the anti-gun clamor and proposed gun legislation comes from liberals and progressives. Guns bans are supported by Barack Obama, Martin O’Malley, and Rosie O’Donnell. O’ say can’t they see the Second Amendment?

Oddly, perhaps, it is also liberals and progressives who support the “death with dignity” idea and favor legalizing assisted suicide. http://www.deathwithdignity.org/

These kill yourself folks make two broad arguments.

The first is about liberty and autonomy: that the right to end one’s life at a time of one’s choosing is one of the most basic rights there is. But owning the gun of your choice isn’t? They ask why should the government be allowed to prohibit assisted suicide, but insist of prohibiting ownership of certain weapons. Hm-m-m….

The second argument concerns compassion: why should a suffering or terminally-ill person be denied the right to end his or her own suffering?
I would think that all the liberals and progressives involved with the death with dignity movement and favor assisted suicide would also be in favor of people having guns so they can assist themselves. But, that doesn’t seem to be the case. Is this a conflict of interests?

Reply

Steve

9:05 pm on Saturday, February 16, 2013

"Almost all of the anti-gun clamor and proposed gun legislation comes from liberals and progressives."

That's not true. The leader of the Gun Control movement, James Brady is a staunch Conservative. Ronald Reagan never met a gun control bill he didn't like. The same for Bush.

Reply

Steve

12:20 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

I don't think I would call Harry Reid a "conservative" but he got an A Rating from the NRA almost every year her ran for office.

Reply

Rick M

9:16 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013

Another unfair and unbalanced guns are evil article! No mention of the lower deaths from homicides in areas where gun ownership is higher. Suicide is a terrible waste but living in an evil society totally unprotected is just plain irresponsible and deadly.

Reply

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how