.
Feedback

Carroll County Mom Named Grand Marshal of Baltimore Pride Parade

Watch June Horner's moving conversation about her 25 years of advocacy for her son and gay and lesbian rights.

June Horner walked in her first Baltimore Pride Parade in the mid-1980s, not long after learning her son was gay. Since then she has been on a quest to let the world know "our kids are fine just the way they are."

This Saturday she gets to lead that cause.

After having a presence in pride parades in Washington, D.C., Philadelphia, New York and San Francisco, Horner for the first time won't be walking at the back of the procession; she will be grand marshal of the Baltimore Pride Parade.

Horner, a Sykesville resident, said she's thrilled to be marshaling the parade, an honor reserved for city leaders and pioneers in the LGBT rights movement, according to a Baltimore OUTloud article.

Horner said that she found out 25 years ago that her youngest son was gay. She told Patch that it was a difficult time for her in trying to understand what that meant for her and her son.

She said she found support and understanding with the help of PFLAG (Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays). She has been advocating for gay rights and understanding ever since.

Horner was instrumental in starting PFLAG chapters in Baltimore County and Howard County. She also helped form a PFLAG chapter in Carroll County just last year.

The Baltimore Pride Parade will take place Saturday, June 16, starting at 4 p.m. The parade kicks off at the corners of Monument and Charles streets in Mount Vernon, and travels four blocks north up Charles Street to Chase Street.

"I've never seen the front of a Pride parade because I've always been in the back walking with my son," Horner said. "This year I'll get to be at the front of the parade. I think it's just wonderful that I'm a parent, just a parent being recognized as an ally ... it's a great honor for me."

Kym Byrnes (Editor) June 14, 2012 at 06:11 pm
Congratulations June! I'm sure it'll be an amazing day.
June Horner June 14, 2012 at 10:50 pm
Thank you for the Beautiful Article and Kind words !!
Natalie Davis June 14, 2012 at 11:02 pm
Way to go, June, congratulations, and thank you!!! xo
All the Gay Children of the World June 14, 2012 at 11:13 pm
My mom has finally received the credit she deserves
Suzanne Albert June 15, 2012 at 12:55 pm
Thank you for being a leader for equality.
Suzanne Albert June 15, 2012 at 12:58 pm
Thank you for providing leadership for equality.
JoAnn Nicholls June 15, 2012 at 01:27 pm
I think it is important for folks to know that there are members of the gay community who are in opposition to SSM..It is sad that their voice is constantly hushed in order to promote one side of the story....This article is written by a gay man who has done extensive research in states that already allow SSM...he says unequivocally that this issue is NOT about civil rights for gays but IS about pushing a political agenda....http://potomacteapartyreport.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/the-myth-of-the-same-sex-marriage-mandate/ I do however congratulate any parent who has found peace with a gay son or daughter....all children want acceptance and long for their parents to be proud of them...I just don't think the media is being equally supportive to members of this community who sing a different tune..
JoAnn Nicholls June 15, 2012 at 01:28 pm
http://potomacteapartyreport.wordpress.com/2012/02/22/the-myth-of-the-same-sex-marriage-mandate/
Alissa June 15, 2012 at 07:17 pm
The article isn't about SSM. Likewise, not every article about gays and lesbians (or their champions) is about SSM. IMO, it really isn't an appropriate venue for a diatribe against SSM, but rather a place for a discussion about the woman in the article and her many accomplishments. Congrats to Mrs. Horner!
JoAnn Nicholls June 15, 2012 at 07:54 pm
With all due respect Alissa....if not for posting this in a comment section of an article promoting gay pride this opinion would never make it to an article in any media publication....this man, who IS gay and has done studies in every state where SSM has been legally allowed has sent his data and articles to publications both locally and nationally....NO ONE will publish them...and as long as I have a first amendment right, I will comment as I see fit....
Alissa June 15, 2012 at 09:24 pm
Like I said, not every article relating to gay people is also a story about SSM. I could post a story here about just about anything that I don't believe is getting enough air time and it still wouldn't make it right or relevant just because I can. So, go ahead and post about this one gay person who did "research" who can't get an audience, but that doesn't make it relevant. It must be that there is no market for the "story" you're hawking, otherwise the media outlets would run it and make money like they do with whatever stories they run to make money. You know, capitalism and all. Or, maybe the "research" doesn't hold up to any recognized standards.
Kym Byrnes (Editor) June 15, 2012 at 09:29 pm
@JoAnn, I am not familiar with this person or his research but Patch offers a forum for local folks to have a voice. I encourage anyone who has something to share (and can do it appropriately) to blog on Patch. Just go to Blog at the top of the homepage and follow the prompts to agree to terms of use and post a blog. Thanks for your thoughts.
JoAnn Nicholls June 16, 2012 at 12:27 am
Oh Alissa, make no mistake...he's getting an audience....just not one from the far left MSM liberals...they want his to GO AWAY!!!!!
Timothy Hurley June 16, 2012 at 01:15 am
Hello June:
Congratulations and thank you for your remarkable leadership, your frank honesty, and your kind willingness to share your story as a compassionate parent of a gay child with us all. My hope is that parents who are facing the prospect that their children may be gay with uncertainty about how to handle this emerging experience in their lives will look to your compassionate, loving, and steadfast example before letting the matter come between them and their gay children. I'm expecting only the best for you and us all. Namaste. Tim Hurley
Mark Patro June 16, 2012 at 06:40 am
JoAnn--Yes there are dissenters within the gay community. They are people who do not want to follow what they call "the heterosexual norm". I have heard it said that, “getting married is too het for me.” This perspective has nothing to do with the conversation on attaining civil rights or human rights coming from within the vast majority of the LGBT community. It comes from a mindset that wants to differentiate anyone LGBT form the "heterosexual community." This is plainly an anti-assimilationist argument. If you haven't guessed by now this is a VERY small minority within the community of people seeking equal rights for LGBT people. Just because people see the attainment of Marriage Equality as a civil rights effort, which it is, does not mean they have some evil intentioned "agenda". We must unfortunately pursue our civil rights in a political sphere, made exponentially worse by Tea Party mouth pieces. Those who disagree with marriage are trying to discolor our effort to attain equality. These kinds of people, whether LGBT or not, are simply anti-marriage, but will never say so.
JoAnn Nicholls June 16, 2012 at 11:30 am
Mark, perhaps if this were about "equal rights", that being the gay community could engage in every single "right" that a heterosexual couple engages in, you could, or SOMEONE could answer me, why it is your community snubbed a civil union option that was offered by the legislative body. why is it necessary to change the definition of what this "small minority" perceives as their idea of marriage??? I have a family member who is gay...I believe she agrees with me that this has NOTHING to do with the gay community, but more to do with an agenda....If you want to convince all those in the 32 states that have rejected SSM through public vote, it appears you need to convince your own community first...and perhaps allow those like the gentleman in the article I posted above a forum to publish articles with his statistics to allow true journalism to occur instead of "one side" and THEN your community will no longer be accused of pushing a particular "agenda"...
Lori Hollander June 16, 2012 at 05:22 pm
JoAnn,
As marriage and relationship therapists for straight and gay couples for 31 years, my husband and I are experts in the field. Whether gay or straight, human connection, relationships and family are a core need and desire for people to live healthy, joyful and productive lives. Most people, gay or straight, grow up wanting to find someone they love, get married and have a family. Who a person happens to be attracted to has nothing to do with the desire for human love, connection and family. Our gay children want the same thing in life as every child wants – love and family. This is not about an agenda. It is about being treated just like everyone else. In all our years of counseling couples, gay couples are no different than straight couples except they have to deal with discrimination. And we can tell you that our gay kids want to get married and have families just like yours. Thank you for asking about the issue of why “civil unions” are not acceptable: (CONTINUED IN MY NEXT COMMENT)
Lori Hollander June 16, 2012 at 05:27 pm
“civil unions” are not acceptable: There are 2 types of marriage in our country – 1) civil marriage which consists of going to the courthouse to get a “civil marriage license” required by the state; AND 2) religious marriage, the ceremony performed by clergy in a church or synagogue. Though they're both called “Marriage” they actually are 2 separate acts. A couple can have a civil marriage and not have a religious marriage, but you cannot have a religious marriage without a “civil marriage license.”
The Civil Marriage Protection Act signed by O’Malley allows same-sex couples to get a “civil marriage license” so they become legally married in the eyes of the state. The Law has specific language that exempts every religious institution from being required to perform same-sex marriage. That’s why this is a civil issue. Gay people want to marry like others for love, family and to function like any other married couple. Civil unions single them out as “separate but equal.” Interracial marriage was outlawed till the late 1960’s. When that changed imagine if we called their marriages “integrated unions.” Imagine if when blacks got citizenship they weren't allowed to be called citizens but were called “civil citizens.” It wouldn't be inclusive or equal. The word “marriage” signifies a rite of passage and degree of commitment that's familiar to everyone. Civil union is “lesser than.” I'd be happy to discuss this with you further
Lori Hollander June 16, 2012 at 05:28 pm
June,
We are sooooo proud of you!!! With love and pride, Lori and Bob
JoAnn Nicholls June 16, 2012 at 06:01 pm
Lori Hollander, Can you tell all of us how you treated patients who were gay when homosexuality was listed in the DSM-IV? did you treat them according to your "theory" now, or did you buck your colleagues and dismiss this fact? in addition, I have a sister who is gay. I consider myself just as much as an expert as you claim to be with your degree. I have been around gay people my entire life and the minute you can find two people of the same sex who can TOGETHER procreate I will concede that they are indeed NO DIFFERENT then a married couple and should be considered within he "religious" definition of marriage..A civil union could indeed be recognized through a religious entity. here are churches who would have no issue marrying any couple of he same sex. Perhaps you as a therapist could explain why it is that the gentleman I have provided in the above link who opposes SSM and is gay cannot seem to get any media source o print a story with extremely revealing data on this subject???? I completely disagree that this is not an agenda. It is a subject which has become so uncomfortable for ANY person who opposes this subject while other stereotypes are gleefully discriminated by the left...As a therapist I would think it important that ALL information and ALL voices are allowed to be heard to debate this subject. It is clear that the majority of citizens in this country have had their say a the ballot box and are overwhelmingly not in favor of changing the definition.
JoAnn Nicholls June 16, 2012 at 06:26 pm
One more point...I read your posts and all I read is government intermingling in religious decisions....The very same people advocating that this Governor has done some miraculous in signing this law also chastises my county Commissioners because they pray prior to public meetings...they (the hard left) love to use government and religion when it suits their agenda....hypocrisy and the left are common place....
Buck Harmon June 16, 2012 at 09:53 pm
Well said JoAnn...!
Joyce Moody June 17, 2012 at 01:30 am
Congratulations "Miss" June! I commend you on your advocacy and passion for this cause and for your efforts to encourage equality for all individuals.
JoAnn Nicholls June 22, 2012 at 05:28 pm
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/activists-take-out-frustration-ronald-reagan_647733.html Not an agenda? Could've fooled me.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westminster Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kym Byrnes (Editor) June 10, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Congratulations graduates! May you be as successful in the next part of your journey as you were atRead More St. John School.
Artemus Gordon April 9, 2013 at 02:39 am
I don't live in your district and I am not a member of your party. I have watched you during yourRead More meetings with the commissioners and you handle things very well. You have a balance of private and public sector experience which is a necessary background to have to guide the county. It will be nice to have a competent person with your qualifications to run against someone who is totally unqualified but never had any opposition in the last election. Now she will have to attend the voter forums and explin her views and positions. Let the chips fall where they may. The emperor will have no clothes.
romeo valianti April 12, 2013 at 11:26 pm
Wow, this is great news. Hopefully, 1 down and 4 to go!! Make sure Frazier shows up at theRead More political forums this time. She chose to miss every one last time, so she did not have to answer questions on her positions and her horrible record the first time around in 1998-2002. She will try to do that again to get re-elected.
Bonnie Grady April 13, 2013 at 01:19 am
If Frazier runs for reelection in 2014, I hope someone will have the nerve to ask her pointblank, onRead More camera, about her relationship to Roscoe Bartlett. Folks who've been around Carroll County for a while know the answer: there is no relation. She just tacked that on when she decided to run the first time. It may be her maiden name - or not - but she has never bothered to answer the question. She just let folks assume there is a connection, and lots of folks fell for it.