Commissioners Weigh Airport Expansion Options

Carroll County's Board of Commissioners will make a decision on the airport expansion on Jan. 26.

The Board of County Commissioners met in front of a packed room Thursday afternoon for a highly anticipated Carroll County Regional Airport discussion.

The previous board of commissioners made a master plan that included the expansion of the airport. The estimated $74 million expansion includes the purchase of 13 acres of land and an increase in the size of the runway.

Simply put, the decision is whether to expand the airport so that it can accommodate increased traffic of larger planes (C3 planes) such as corporate jets, or to remain a C2 airport that can continue to accommodate smaller planes such as single engine planes. At the very least, the current runway will require upgrades in 2017 to the tune of $5 million ($125,000 of which Carroll County will have to pay).

According to a previous , if Carroll County decides to move forward with the planned expansion, the county would ultimately pay for 2.5 percent of the $74 million. Ninety-five percent would be funded by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the other 2.5 percent would be paid for by the state.

Community members weighed in at the beginning of the meeting. Several residents support the opinion of Silver Run resident James Graham who believe that the airport will not benefit most of the county residents.

"The airport expansion is using tax payer money to benefit a relatively few number of people, that aren't the tax payers," Graham said. "The idea of trying to get business to come by putting money into infrastructure has not panned out across the country, and the costs that are incurred are seldom recouped."

But there were also proponents of the plan in attendance. Barbara Biller is the president of Intellitech and the chair of Carroll County Economic Development Commission, which serves as the advisory board to the commissioners.

Biller said that the Economic Development Commission, which has wide representation in the county, unanimously voted in favor of the airport expansion.

"We have studied the airport expansion effort two times in the last three years and we have unanimously felt that the commissioners should move forward with the expansion project," Biller said.  "This project offers short term construction jobs and long term higher paying jobs." 

Surdex Corporation, which provides geothermal data services, announced a proposal at a June meeting to build a 30,000 square foot facility at the airport should the expansion move forward. The facility would be used to consolidate the business' four locations.

Biller added that part of the reason Knorr Brake Company decided to expand their headquarters in Carroll County was due to the possibility of an airport expansion.

As they have done in the past two public meetings, the commissioners explored several airport options, one of which is just an update of the current runway as FAA standards dictate that the current runway would have to be resurfaced around 2017.

Deputy Director of Public Works, Jeff Topper, said that if Carroll County resurfaced the current runway, it would cost about $5 million, approximately $125,000 of which the County would have to pay. The FAA would cover the remaining cost.

The commissioners have also explored costs and benefits associated with moving forward with the planned expansion project. According to Commissioner Roush, the FAA is offering funds through the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). He said that the FAA is interested in supporting this expansion project because regional airports can help relieve some of the general aviation congestion from bigger airports (such as BWI). He also said that the FAA funds these projects for safety and access reasons.

But there are time constraints that the commissioners must consider as they make their decision. According to Roush, the environmental impact study that was done to determine if the expansion was feasible does not expire, but the findings of the study expire April 8.

The study took more than a year to complete and cost more than half a million dollars. Additionally, the environmental impact study that was done was only relevant for expansion to a C3 airport, if the commissioners decide to do a lesser project, another economic impact study will be required.

Roush said that the FAA will not fund any airport projects that are not specified in the master plan. Since the airport expansion is currently in Carroll County's master plan, if the county decided to do a project other than the expansion (such as just the airport runway resurfacing project), then it would require a whole new master plan in order to receive federal funds.

The commissioners are scheduled to vote on the airport decision next Thursday, Jan. 26.

Watch the airport discussion meeting on the Carroll County government website.

Buck Harmon January 20, 2012 at 01:53 PM
Where does the FAA get it's money from..?
Scott LaCoss Jr January 20, 2012 at 02:51 PM
Good Question, but regardless fo whether Carroll COunty decides to move forward with the planned expansion or not, that money is going to be given out. If not us, then some other county across the county. Why not bring those funds to Carroll County?
Kym Byrnes (Editor) January 20, 2012 at 03:17 PM
Buck, in the meeting yesterday, Commissioner Roush said the FAA uses a trust fund, started in the 1960s, to fund these projects. He said congress has never raided the fund and has never failed to appropriate it.
Buck Harmon January 20, 2012 at 03:37 PM
Thanks Kym..
Edmund Klebe January 20, 2012 at 04:55 PM
Kym. Buck: When was the last time this "trust" fund was audited? If the congress has never raided the fund, why is it necessary to state that "[the congress] has never failed to appropriate it"?
Edmund Klebe January 20, 2012 at 04:57 PM
Scott: There's ALWAYS going to be robbery, so why spend so much on the police force?
Kym Byrnes (Editor) January 20, 2012 at 07:29 PM
I have my bets on who will vote in what direction (they will remain a secret) but I am pretty confident that Commissioner Shoemaker is against the expansion and will vote accordingly. I thought he made it pretty clear yesterday, without coming out and saying it, that he doesn't think it's the right move for Carroll County government. But that's just my opinion for the sake of conversation. Off the record :)
Edmund Klebe January 20, 2012 at 08:05 PM
One of the things being lost in the whole convoluted mess is: at the beginning of this process, while Gouge and company were in office, it was constantly reiterated that there would be a lot of time before any irrevocable action was taken, we were constantly assured that "no final decision has been made." Now, suddenly, we are being told that expansion is inevitable because the prior board approved the expansion, and once the FAA accepted the new master plan, CCRA was thereby declared to be a CIII airport, albeit presently in non-compliance with CIII standards, and once the FAA issued a finding of No Significant Impact, the future was set in stone. The ONLY NEW information that came out yesterday was the allegation that once FAA funds have been expended for purchase of land -- does the Miller Asphalt plant qualify ?-- the land will be "airport land" in perpetuity, eternally. This, however, is just another piece of pro-expansion propaganda in that if in the future the decision should be made to close the present airport, the money used to buy the aforesaid land would have to reimbursed to the FAA at the present value of the land previously acquired.
Ron andCon Buczkowski January 21, 2012 at 06:18 PM
This citizen is and always was opposed to the expansion. A county air field is one thing but jets are here already and more and bigger jets are coming. 4 of the 5 Commissioners said they were opposed to the expansion and that is what got them elected. I desire the County to buy my property, but no County contact has yet been received. NO AIRPORT EXPANSION!
Buck Harmon January 21, 2012 at 06:30 PM
Perhaps corporate campaign contributions out weigh citizen campaign contributions... I don't like the thought of an airport that could accommodate the military large stuff..
Edmund Klebe January 21, 2012 at 07:34 PM
If you watch, and CAREFULLY listen to, the January 19 afternoon meeting, you will learn that the REAL emphasis in on how much fuel will be sold. If they get their desire, the small piston jockeys presently using CCRA will gradually be forced out by the jets and the turboprops and the local piston jockeys will learn just how duplicitous these local politicos are.
JC January 24, 2012 at 06:15 PM
One thing I haven't read or heard anywhere is airport fire safety & protection. Even with the present size of the airport, & not to mention if it gets bigger, the volunteer fire departments in the vicinity are not equipped or manned to properly mitigate an incident. This is not meant as a slight to the volunteers, it's just a fact of the matter at hand.
Kym Byrnes (Editor) January 26, 2012 at 12:55 AM
JC, I asked Bob Cumberland, President of the Westminster Fire Department, about your inquiry. This is his response, "The index that the airport comes under does not need fire protection and won’t even if they increase the size of the run way. That is determined by the FAA and there is no regulator passenger service from this airport. The airport is in the Westminster Fire Department first due area and would require use to respond to any emergency there. We do not have equipment to handle an emergency there or trained personnel for air craft firefighting and that is a different standard than a normal firefighter."


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something