Maryland Weighs Fracking's Potential Impact

Is fracking worth it?

By Greg Masters, Capital News Service       

GARRETT COUNTY - Garrett County resident Dana Shimrock was relieved when Maryland put the brakes on drilling in the natural gas-rich Marcellus Shale before a single well could be drilled.

"They had just completed a well not far from me across the border in Pennsylvania," Shimrock said. "I knew they were ready to roll over here into Maryland, and I really felt that we weren't ready for that."

Shimrock is one of many Western Maryland residents concerned about the controversial gas extraction process known as hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," which some say threatens the environment and public health.

But many others in Maryland, including Delegate Wendell Beitzel, R-Garrett and Allegany, feel the potential economic benefits of Marcellus Shale drilling outweigh the environmental risks.

Landowners will get "huge sums of money" from leases and gas royalties, drilling will bring jobs and Garrett County will benefit from a severance tax on the gas that is produced, Beitzel said.

"Now we have an opportunity to lift this area up, as we are witnessing in some of our neighbor states," he said.

The public debate over fracking has swept across states such as Pennsylvania, New York, Texas, Colorado and Wyoming, where reserves of natural gas lie deep underground, trapped bubble-like in shale formations, as well as North Dakota and Montana, home to the oil-bearing Bakken Formation.

Energy companies have made shale oil and gas deposits profitable to explore by drilling horizontally into the shale layer and injecting a pressurized mix of water, sand and chemicals to crack open the rock, releasing trapped oil or gas.

This "fracking" process has led to a boom in shale gas, which has increased as a share of domestic natural gas production from 4 percent before 2005 to more than 30 percent through October, according to the Energy Information Administration.

But the boom has been accompanied by claims of drinking water contamination and other environmental concerns.

The Marcellus Shale spans 95,000 square miles from Tennessee to New York and underlies a portion of Western Maryland - including all of Garrett County and part of Allegany County - at depths of up to 7,000 feet.

Residents of Western Maryland, where permits for Marcellus Shale drilling have not been approved or denied by the state, can see fracking close-up by looking across the border into Pennsylvania or West Virginia.

Shimrock, who is the library director at Garrett College, said a Pennsylvania friend's water well overflowed with sludge when fracking took place nearby. Another friend told her that his family had been promised 30 years' worth of gas royalties from the well on their land, but after three years the royalties have decreased drastically.

"Unfortunately, I haven't seen a lot of positive, and much negative, in the way of the impact that this has had on communities and on individuals who have agreed to this kind of procedure on their properties," said Shimrock, who now regrets leasing gas rights to her 50-acre farm in 2006.

In June, Gov. Martin O'Malley issued an executive order calling for a study of Marcellus Shale drilling by August 2014 and creating a 14-member advisory commission to develop recommendations.

The study period makes it unlikely that Maryland will allow energy companies to drill in the Marcellus Shale any time soon.

"The whole process set up by the executive order and the commission was more one to delay this activity," said Drew Cobbs, executive director of the Maryland Petroleum Council. "The length is way longer than it needs to be."

A poll commissioned by Cobbs' organization and conducted by Gonzales Research & Marketing Strategies in September found that 74 percent of Maryland voters and 70 percent of Western Maryland voters favored the development of natural gas resources in Western Maryland.

But whether Maryland will allow drilling is a "very open question," said Delegate Heather Mizeur, D-Montgomery, who is on the governor's commission.

"Personally, I come at it probably leaning more towards the side of I would rather there not be any drilling," she said.

Mizeur was the lead sponsor of a bill in the last legislative session that would have imposed a moratorium on fracking until the completion of a two-year study. The bill stalled in the Senate after passing the House.

Beitzel, who opposed Mizeur's bill, worries the delay will make Maryland less competitive than neighboring states with much larger shares of the Marcellus Shale.

"The oil companies will be reaching their production levels that are necessary in the market in order to meet the demand. And if they do that, they're just going to bypass Maryland," he said.

Safety and Environmental Impacts Weighed

Fracking is an unconventional gas extraction method that carries risks, such as well blowouts, fracking fluid spills and unsafe disposal of flowback - the toxic, briny wastewater that rises to the surface. The Environmental Protection Agency recently announced it will start developing standards for the disposal of fracking wastewater.

While claims of drinking water contamination are common near fracking sites, industry officials counter that fracking takes place thousands of feet below water sources.

"We take our operations seriously, and in doing so require that our wells are constructed in such a manner that the aquifer is fully protected, as well as ensuring that everything inside the pipe stays inside the pipe," said George Stark, director of external affairs for Cabot Oil & Gas, which has active wells in Pennsylvania.

Proponents argue that natural gas is a cleaner form of energy than coal or oil and will help the United States achieve energy independence.

"We need to cut down on our reliance for foreign oil," Beitzel said. "And if you consider natural gas, when you burn natural gas, it produces 60 percent or thereabouts less (carbon dioxide) emissions than gasoline or oil-based fuel."

But the diesel-powered trucks, diesel generators and compressor stations associated with fracking can cause significant air pollution, said Carnegie Mellon University professor Allen Robinson.

"The concerns are, what are the emissions associated with the production of the gas, which I think is often not factored in when people are giving the short sound bite, 'It's a cleaner-burning fuel than coal,'" Robinson said.

In Wyoming, for example, smog associated with shale oil and gas production has become a serious problem, he said.

The greenhouse gas footprint of fracking has attracted the attention of scientists and environmentalists. Natural gas consists mostly of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and some methane escapes during shale gas production.

"Best practices" to address some of these concerns will be included in recommendations that O'Malley's commission is scheduled to complete by next summer.

Drillers in Maryland may be required to "flare" leaked methane, turning it into carbon dioxide, a less potent greenhouse gas, said David Vanko, a Towson University professor and chair of the commission.

"There are practices that you can undertake at the well head to basically minimize and even eliminate that leakage," Vanko said.

Wait and See for Landowners

The Maryland Department of the Environment has received eight Marcellus Shale drilling permit applications, most in Garrett County.

In recent years, energy companies have also sent "landmen" to talk with landowners in Western Maryland about leasing their property for Marcellus Shale gas production. About 127,000 acres of land in Garrett County - almost a third of the county - have been leased since 2007.

Many of those who signed the first leases in 2006 and 2007 now feel they did not have enough information and were undercompensated, said Paul Roberts, a small business owner in Garrett County and a member of O'Malley's commission.

"Because it was so difficult to get information about how these things worked, people didn't know," Roberts said. "And so hundreds of people signed and agreed to leases that paid them $5 or $7 an acre at a time when, in Pennsylvania, a typical price was $3,000 an acre."

Shimrock was among those who agreed to receive $5 per acre per year when she signed her 5-year lease, she said.

"The people who live in my community feel that we were really, I'll say ripped off," she said. "Also feel a little bit chagrined that we really should have known better."

Shimrock joined an organization called Citizen Shale to warn other landowners to educate themselves about fracking before signing a lease.

Garrett County resident E. Marshall Stacy said during an October Marcellus Shale advisory commission meeting that landowners should consult with lawyers and the local farm bureau to negotiate leases with fair compensation and environmentally protective provisions.

Stacy favors drilling -- he would use the lease money and gas royalties to help his children start a summer camp on his farm -- and said the potential benefits outweigh the risks.

"If the guys come and are drilling at my place, I'm going to be right there watching them, and making sure they're not spilling something or the trucks are not leaking as they come and go," Stacy said.

David J Iacono December 31, 2011 at 03:35 PM
Let's face it, the gas, oil and coal industries could care less about the health and safety of human beings. All they care about is making money and will lie and distort the truth to protect their profits. I believe nothing these corporate criminals and their lying politicians say about the safety of fracking. These politicians are owned and bought by these corporations. There is growing evidence that the fracking process to extract natural gas is polluting the fresh water supply and killing people. Is the extra money that landowners get or the few jobs created really worth the off setting costs of funerals and treatment for life threatening illnesses like cancer. Is money really more important than the wellbeing of our children and our families? To the oil, gas and coal industries, the answer is yes. If they have their way, their legacy to our children and grandchildren will be a smoking ball of crap.
Jane December 31, 2011 at 04:36 PM
Actually, Judy, it was a good and informative reply made by someone who has the FACTS. Not just someone who puts their own 'spin' on it. I think that all of the oil spills are teaching us better ways of avoiding them altogether for the most part. Just like Three Mile Island did. There's no safety prevention to cover every single occurrence tho, e.g., Japan's tsunamai. Especially severe weather-related stuff or just plain human falibility. Nothing is perfectly safe. Never has been, never will be.
Sue Keller January 30, 2012 at 11:08 PM
My problem with fracking is the potential for earthquakes. Given the geology of the East Coast and the lack of earthquake proof buildings and the fact that no one here can even get earthquake insurance, it's a recipe for disaster. Ohio has put a halt to fracking because of the earthquake there and a company in the UK recently admitted that an earthquake there was due to fracking. Could we please exercise common sense and stop fracking before we all regret it?
withavengeance January 31, 2012 at 05:50 PM
chuck April 29, 2012 at 12:17 AM
Go to gaslandthemovie.com for real life info and stories


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »