.
Feedback

Open Thread: What Do You Think of the Fiscal Cliff Deal?

Readers are asked to share their solutions to problems facing our communities.

Despite actually passing the so-called fiscal cliff deadline, the Senate and House of Representatives passed a bill that President Barack Obama signed, preventing the country from actually going over the cliff, for now.

The fiscal cliff essentially would have resulted in tax rates on all income levels reverting to where they were under President Bill Clinton along with cuts to the federal government’s discretionary spending. Spending on entitlements such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security would not have been touched.

Some economist and politicians argued that the double whammy of increased taxes and reduced government spending could have crippled the economy’s fragile recovery from the 2008 recession.

According to the New York Times, the deal allows for a tax increase on wealthy Americans, extends jobless benefits and keeps an alternative-energy tax credit.

The deal may have just kicked the can down the road, leading to another showdown between Obama and his Democratic allies in the Senate and Republicans in the House of Representatives.

According to Time Magazine’s Swampland blog: "The automatic cuts to military and domestic programs that the cliff deal averted, known as ‘sequestration,’ now come due at the end of February. Around the same time, the Treasury Department will deplete the stock of accounting gimmicks it can use to stretch the $16.4 trillion debt limit, which the U.S. reached once again on New Year’s Eve. So the pact postpones the pain for a mere two months. A month after that, the U.S. will run out of money to fund the government."

Tell us in comments: What do you think of the fiscal cliff deal? What should the federal government do to address this situation once and for all?

Buck Harmon January 5, 2013 at 01:51 pm
And so a fiscal cliff, which was created by terrible public policy, was temporarily "avoided" by the passage of another round of terrible public policy.
Instead of only focusing on the fiscal cliff vote, why aren't the American people demanding answers on preceding votes which made the cliff inevitable?
Buck Harmon January 5, 2013 at 01:52 pm
More bad government illusion..
benjamin h. hubbard January 5, 2013 at 02:16 pm
TThe democrats have the power to do something to abate spending but not the guts to move in the face of some of their key constituents. They'd lose many of the "takers" and groups they have kept under control for many years!
BillR5 January 5, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Obama has added over $1 trillion in debt each year that he has been in office.
The Democrats spending is out of control and we need to start with a BALANCED BUDGET. Going further into debt is going to ruin the US credit at some point and then the US will become the new GREECE. Romney had the right idea by limiting deductions instead of raising taxes. He should have used Ross Perot's way and show charts on the amount that would be collected by doing this the people would see that the RICH would actually pay more than by raising taxes by 4%. The US is run by Businesses and it needs to run like a business and be PROFITABLE. This would reduce the National DEBT.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Westminster Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kym Byrnes (Editor) June 10, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Congratulations graduates! May you be as successful in the next part of your journey as you were atRead More St. John School.
Artemus Gordon April 9, 2013 at 02:39 am
I don't live in your district and I am not a member of your party. I have watched you during yourRead More meetings with the commissioners and you handle things very well. You have a balance of private and public sector experience which is a necessary background to have to guide the county. It will be nice to have a competent person with your qualifications to run against someone who is totally unqualified but never had any opposition in the last election. Now she will have to attend the voter forums and explin her views and positions. Let the chips fall where they may. The emperor will have no clothes.
romeo valianti April 12, 2013 at 11:26 pm
Wow, this is great news. Hopefully, 1 down and 4 to go!! Make sure Frazier shows up at theRead More political forums this time. She chose to miss every one last time, so she did not have to answer questions on her positions and her horrible record the first time around in 1998-2002. She will try to do that again to get re-elected.
Bonnie Grady April 13, 2013 at 01:19 am
If Frazier runs for reelection in 2014, I hope someone will have the nerve to ask her pointblank, onRead More camera, about her relationship to Roscoe Bartlett. Folks who've been around Carroll County for a while know the answer: there is no relation. She just tacked that on when she decided to run the first time. It may be her maiden name - or not - but she has never bothered to answer the question. She just let folks assume there is a connection, and lots of folks fell for it.